_____________________________________________________________________________
OPINION OF TRUSTEES
_____________________________________________________________________________
In Re
Complainant: Employee
Respondent: Employer
ROD Case No: 88-333 – December 5, 1990
Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William Miller,
Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee; Thomas H. Saggau, Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan
and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of
Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the
provision of health benefits coverage for an Employee under the terms of the Employer Benefit
Plan.
Background Facts
The Complainant worked in a classified position for the Respondent from October 1988 until
May 22, 1990, when the Complainant accepted employment with another Employer. The
Complainant contends that the Respondent failed to provide health benefits coverage at the level
prescribed by the terms of the Employer Benefit Plan. The Complainant has submitted copies of
unpaid bills for medical expenses incurred during his employment with the Respondent. The
Complainant states that he has paid some of the bills in order to avoid legal action to collect the
amounts due.
The representative for the Complainant contends that the Complainant was without health
benefits coverage when some of his medical expenses were incurred. Information provided to the
Funds indicates that the Respondent provided health benefits coverage for the Complainant
through Blue Cross and Blue Shield, effective July 1, 1989. Under this policy, benefit payments
are subject to an annual deductible of $100 and, thereafter, benefits are paid up to 80% of the
covered expenses until a beneficiary reaches the annual out-of-pocket limit of $1,000. Coverage
for vision care is not provided and prescriptions for “name” brand drugs are subject to a copayment of $10 under this policy.
Dispute
Is the Respondent required to provide health benefits coverage for the Complainant and his
eligible dependents at the level prescribed by the Employer Benefit Plan?
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-333
Page 2
Positions of the Parties
Position of the Complainant: The Respondent is required to provide health benefits coverage for
the Complainant and his eligible dependents at the level prescribed by the Employer Benefit Plan
and to pay the covered medical expenses incurred by the Complainant and his eligible
dependents during his employment with the Respondent.
Position of the Respondent: The Respondent has not replied to repeated correspondence from
Funds’ staff requesting its position in this dispute.
Pertinent Provisions
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1988 provides
in pertinent part:
(3)(i) Each signatory Employer shall establish and maintain an Employee benefit
plan to provide, implemented through an insurance carrier(s), health and other
non-pension benefits for its Employees covered by this Agreement as well as
pensioners, under the 1974 Pension Plan and Trust, whose last signatory
classified employment was with such Employer. The benefits provided by the
Employer to its eligible Participants pursuant to such plans shall be guaranteed
during the term of this Agreement by that Employer at levels set forth in such
plans…. The plans established pursuant to this subsection are incorporated by
reference and made a part of this Agreement, and the terms and conditions under
which the health and other non-pension benefits will be provided under such
plans are as to be set forth in such plans.
Article I (1), (2) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article I – Definitions
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
(1) “Employer” means (Employer’s Name).
(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of
1988, as amended from time to time and any successor agreement.
(4) “Employee” shall mean a person working in a classified job for the Employer,
eligible to receive benefits hereunder.
Article II A. (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Article II – Eligibility
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-333
Page 3
The persons eligible to receive the health benefits pursuant to Article III are as follows:
A. Active Employees
(4) A new Employee will be eligible for health benefits from the first day
worked with the Employer.
Article III A. (8) and (9) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide in pertinent part:
Article III – Benefits
A. Health Benefits
(8) Co-Payments
Certain benefits provided in this Plan shall be subject to the co-payments
set forth below and such co-payments shall be the responsibility of the
Beneficiary….
Co-Payments for covered Health Benefits are established as follows:
Benefit Co-Payment
(a) Physician services as an Working Group — $7.50 per visit up
out-patient as set forth in to a maximum of $150 per 12-month
Section A(2) and physician period(*
) per family.
visits in connection with the Non-working Group — $5 per visit
benefits set forth in Section up to a maximum of $100 per 12-month
A(3), paragraph (c) but only period(*
) per family.
for pre- and post-natal visits
if the physician charges
separately for such visits in
addition to the charge for
delivery, and paragraphs (g)
through (m), paragraph (n)
except inpatient surgery,
paragraph (o) and Section A(7)
paragraph (f).
(b) Prescription drugs and $5 per prescription or refill up to
insulin, as set forth in a $50 maximum per 12-month period(*
)
*
The 12-month periods shall begin on the following dates: March 27, 1988; March 27, 1989; March
27, 1990; March 27, 1991 and lurch 27, 1992.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-333
Page 4
Section A(4) and take-home per family.
drugs following hospital Note: For purposes of this co-payment
confinement as set forth in provision, a prescription or refill
Section A(1)(a). shall be deemed to be each 30 days
(or fraction thereof) supply.
(9) Vision Care Program
Actual Charge Up to
(a) Benefits Maximum Amount Frequency Limits
Vision Examination $20 Once every 24 months
Per Lens (Maximum= 2) Once every 24 months
– Single Vision 10
– Bifocal 15
– Trifocal 20
– Lenticular 25
– Contact 15
Frames 14 Once every 24 months
Article III D. (1)(e) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides in pertinent part:
D. General Provisions
(1) Continuation of Coverage
(e) Quit or Discharge
If an Employee quits (for any reason) or is discharged, health, life
and accidental death and dismemberment insurance coverage will
terminate as of the date last worked….
Discussion
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-333
Page 5
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the 1988 Wage Agreement requires a signatory Employer to
establish and maintain an Employer Benefit Plan to provide health and other non-pension
benefits for its Employees. The Wage Agreement stipulates that benefits provided by an
Employer pursuant to such Plan shall be guaranteed during the term of the Agreement by that
Employer at levels set forth in such Plan.
Article II A. of the Employer Benefit Plan provides health benefits coverage for active
Employees working in classified jobs for a signatory Employer. Article III D. (1)(e) states that, if
an Employee quits for any reason, health benefits coverage will terminate as of the date last
worked. Inasmuch as the Complainant was actively employed in a classified position by the
Respondent from October 1988 until he quit to accept other employment on May 22, 1990, the
Respondent is responsible for providing health benefits coverage for the Complainant and his
eligible dependents from his first day worked for the Respondent through May 22, 1990.
Article III A. of the Employer Benefit Plan specifies the benefits, including vision care coverage,
which are to be provided under the Employer Benefit Plan. Article III A. (8) of the Employer
Benefit Plan specifies the co-payments which are the responsibility of the beneficiary for
medical services and prescriptions. Levels of benefits to be provided to Employees, Pensioners
and their dependents and survivors are established through collective bargaining and may not be
unilaterally changed by an Employer. The Respondent’s use of a non-conforming health
coverage plan is inconsistent with the provisions of the Wage Agreement and the Employer
Benefit Plan. The Respondent is responsible for providing health benefits coverage for the
Complainant and his eligible dependents at the level specified in the Employer Benefit Plan, and
for payment of the Plan-covered medical expenses incurred by the Complainant and his eligible
dependents during his active employment with the Respondent.
Opinion of the Trustees
The Respondent is required to provide health benefits coverage for the Complainant and his
eligible dependents at the level specified in the Employer Benefit Plan and to pay the Plancovered medical expenses incurred by the Complainant and his eligible dependents during his
active employment with the Respondent.