Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-341
Page 1
______________________________________________________________________________
OPINION OF TRUSTEES
______________________________________________________________________________
In Re
Complainant: Employee
Respondent: Employer
ROD Case No: 84-341 – July 10, 1987
Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William B. Jordan,
Trustee; William Miller, Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan
and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of
Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the
provision of health benefits coverage for an Employee under the terms of the Employer Benefit
Plan.
Background Facts
The Complainant performed classified work for the Respondent from September 16, 1985
through December 12, 1985, at which time he claims he became disabled as the result of a workrelated injury. According to information provided to the Funds, the Complainant worked 220-1/2
hours for the Respondent during the 24-month period immediately prior to his date last worked.
The Respondent contracted with an Employer association to provide health benefits.coverage to
its Employees, the Complainant included, until December 31, 1985. On March 17, 1986, the
Employer association filed a Petition for Relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and
ceased paying health benefits claims. The Respondent provided health benefits coverage for the
Complainant through a different insurance carrier beginning January 1, 1986.
The Complainant’s representative has submitted unpaid bills for medical services which were
incurred by the Complainant and his dependents during the period from October 28, 1985 to
December 18, 1985. The Complainant’s representative contends that the Respondent is
responsible for payment of the outstanding medical bills incurred by the Complainant and his
dependents during that period.
Dispute
Whether the Respondent is responsible for payment of covered Medical charges incurred by the
Complainant and his eligible dependents during the period from October 28, 1985 to December
18, 1985.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-341
Page 2
Positions of the Parties
Position of the Complainant: The Respondent is responsible for payment of Medical charges
incurred the Complainant and his eligible dependents during the period from October 28, 1985 to
December 18, 1985.
Position of the Respondent: The Respondent has failed to inform the Funds of its position in t is
dispute.
Pertinent Provisions
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1984 provides
in pertinent part:
(c) 1974 Plans and Trusts
(3)(i) Each signatory Employer shall establish and maintain an Employee
benefit plan to provide, implemented through an insurance
carrier(s), health and other non-pension benefits for its Employees
covered by this Agreement as well as pensioners, under the 1974
Pension Plan and Trust, whose last signatory classified
employment was with such Employer. The benefits provided by the
Employer to its eligible Participants pursuant to such plans shall be
guaranteed during the term of this Agreement by that Employer at
levels set forth in such plans.
Article I (1), (2) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article I – Definitions
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
(1) “Employer” means (Employer’s Name).
(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage
Agreement of 1984, as amended from time to time and any successor
agreement.
(4) “Employee” shall mean a person working in a classified job for the
Employer, eligible to receive benefits hereunder.
Article II A.(4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Article II – Eligibility
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-341
Page 3
The persons eligible to receive the health benefits pursuant to Article III are as follows:
A. Active Employees
(4) A new Employee will be eligible for health benefits from the first day
worked with the Employer.
Article III D. (1)(a) and (b) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
D. General Provisions
(1) Continuation of Coverage
(a) Layoff
If an Employee ceases work because of layoff, continuation of
health, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance coverage is
as follows:
Numbers of Hours Worked for the
Employer in the 24 Consecutive
Calendar Month Period Immediately Prior to the Employee’s Period of Coverage Continuation
Date Last Worked from the Date Last Worked
2,000 or more hours Balance of month plus 12 months
500 or more but less than Balance of month plus 6 months
2,000 hours
Less than 500 hours 30 days
(b) Disability
Except as otherwise provided in Article II, Section C, if an
Employee ceases work because of disability, the Employee will be eligible
to continue health, life and accidental death and dismemberment coverage
while disabled for the greater of (i) the period of eligibility for Sickness
and Accident benefits, or (ii) the period as set forth in the schedule in (a)
above.
Article XI Section (c) of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1984 provides in
pertinent part:
Article XI – Sickness and Accident Benefits
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-341
Page 4
(c) Commencement and Duration of Benefits
Sickness and Accident Benefits shall begin with the first day of disability
resulting from an accident, and with the eighth day of disability resulting from
sickness, except that if the Employee is hospitalized because of a disabling
sickness requiring surgical treatment or intensive care, benefits shall begin with
the first full day of hospitalization.
Benefits for disability resulting from an accident, either on or off the job,
shall be payable for a maximum of 52 weeks, regardless of the length of the
Employee’s classified employment with the Employer at the time of the accident.
Discussion
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the 1984 Wage Agreement requires Employers to provide an
Employee benefit plan… ‘implemented through an insurance carrier(s), [for] health and other nonpension benefits…’ It further requires, that ‘benefits provided by the Employer to its eligible
Participants pursuant to such plans shall be guaranteed during the term of this Agreement by that
Employer at levels set forth in such plans.’ Although the Respondent in the instant case had
implemented its Employer Benefit Plan until December 31, 1985 through an Employer
association which subsequently filed bankruptcy, such event does not relieve the Respondent of
its primary obligation to provide benefits pursuant to the Wage Agreement. Inasmuch as the
Complainant was eligible for health benefits as an active Employee from September 16, 1985
through December 12, 1985, and thereafter as a disabled Employee pursuant to the applicable
Plan provisions, the Respondent is responsible for payment of the covered medical charges
incurred by the Complainant and his eligible dependents during the period from October 28,
1985 to December 18, 1985.
Opinion of Trustees
The Respondent is responsible for payment of covered medical expenses incurred by the
Complainant and his eligible dependents during the period from October 28, 1985 to December
18, 1985 under the terms of the Employer Benefit Plan.