______________________________________________________________________________
OPINION OF TRUSTEES
______________________________________________________________________________
In Re
Complainant: Employees
Respondent: Employer
ROD Case No: 84-030 – August 27, 1985
Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William B. Jordan,
Trustee; William Miller, Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan
and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of
Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the
provision of health benefits coverage for Employees under the terms of the Employer Benefit
Plan. They hereby render their opinion on this matter.
Background Facts
The Complainants are classified Employees of the Respondent who maintain that the
Respondent is currently utilizing an 80/20 health coverage plan which obligates Employees to
pay 20% of the incurred medical charges to the provider at the time of the service. The
Complainants believe that this is in violation of the 1984 Coal Wage Agreement, which sets
forth specific co-payments ($7.50) for rendered medical services.
The Respondent maintains that it is complying with the 1984 Coal Wage Agreement. It states
that although it does utilize an 80/20 health coverage plan which helps cut costs, the Employees
are reimbursed by the Respondent for any expenses they pay to the provider over the $7.50 copayment. Medical bills and receipts must be submitted to the Plan Administrator for this
reimbursement.
In support of its position, the Respondent has cited the portion of Article XX (10) “Explanatory
Note on Employer Provided Health Plans” which states that, …”ln some instances, when the
Employee pays for services or drugs, the bills should be obtained and submitted with the claim
form according to the instructions on the claim form.”
Dispute
Is the provision of an 80/20 health coverage plan by the Respondent in violation of the 1984
Coal Wage Agreement?
Position of the Parties
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-030
Page 2
Position of the Complainants: The Respondent is in violation of the 1984 Coal Wage Agreement
by its use of an 80/20 health coverage plan.
Position of the Respondent: The Respondent is in compliance with the 1984 Coal Wage
Agreement because the Employee ultimately is only responsible for payment of the specified
deductible and co-payments.
Pertinent Provisions
Article XX (10) of the 1984 Coal Wage Agreement provides in pertinent part:
Article XX – Health and Retirement Benefits
(10) Health Care
(g) Benefits for office visits to physicians, house calls by physicians, inhospital medical care, visits to a clinic or the out-patient department of a
hospital will be subject to a $7.50 per visit co-payment in the case of
working miners and their dependents up to an annual maximum of $150
per family and will be subject to a $5.00 per visit co-payment in the case
of retired miners (and surviving spouses) and their dependents up to an
annual maximum of $100 per family.
Explanatory Note on Employer Provided Health Plans
Active miners and their surviving spouses and dependents, and pensioners, their
dependents, and surviving spouses receiving pensions from the 1974 Pension Plan, will
receive health care provided by their Employer through insurance carriers. A health
services card identifying the Participant’s eligibility for benefits under the health plan
shall be provided by the Employer.
The Trustees of the UMWA Health and Retirement Funds shall resolve any
disputes to assure consistent application of the health plan provisions which are identical
to the benefit provisions of the 1950 Benefit Plan and Trust.
The following co-payments are required under the plan:
Working NonMiners Working
Prescription $5.00 per $5.00 per
Drugs prescription prescription
Physician $7.50 per $5.00 per
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-030
Page 3
Charges visit visit
No family will have to pay more than the following co-payments in any year:
Working NonMiners Working
Prescription
Drugs $ 50.00 $ 50.00
Physician
Charges $150.00 $100.00
Total $200.00 $150.00
Claim forms will be available at most hospitals, clinics, and physician offices.
Generally, nothing more is required than signing the forms authorizing the hospital,
clinic, or physician to bill the insurance carrier for the services rendered. The insurance
carrier will keep individual records for each Participant and dependent and will notify the
Participant of the co-payments credited to his account. The hospital, clinic, or physician
will bill the Participant for the co-payment amount until the maximum is reached. In
some instances, when the Employee pays for services or drugs, the bills should be
obtained and submitted with the claim form according to the instructions on the form. If
the annual co-payment maximum has been reached, the carrier will remit to the
Participant the full payment for covered benefits.
Covered drug prescriptions may be filled at drugstores, clinics and hospital
prescription offices.
Each Participant will receive a “Summary Plan Description” booklet. Each year a
financial report of the Plan will be provided to each Participant.
Articles I (1), (2) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article I – Definitions
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
(1) “Employer” means (coal company).
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-030
Page 4
(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage
Agreement of 1984, as amended from time to time and any successor
agreement.
(4) “Employee” shall mean a person working in a classified job for the
Employer, eligible to receive benefits hereunder.
Article II A (1) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Article II – Eligibility
The persons eligible to receive the health benefits pursuant to Article III are as follows:
A. Active Employees
Benefits under Article III shall be provided to any Employee who:
(1) is actively at work* for the Employer on the effective date of the Wage
Agreement; or…
Article III – Benefits
A. Health Benefits
(8) Co-Payments
Certain benefits provided in this Plan shall be subject to the co-payments
set forth below and such co-payments shall be the responsibility of the
Beneficiary. The Plan Administrator shall implement such procedures as
deemed appropriate to achieve the intent of these co-payments.
Beneficiaries and providers shall provide such information as the Plan
Administrator may require to effectively administer these co-payments, or
such Beneficiaries or providers shall not be eligible for benefits or
payments under this Plan. Any overpayments made to a provider who
over-charges the Plan in lieu of collecting the applicable co-payment from
a participant or Beneficiary shall be repaid to the Plan Administrator by
such provider.
For purpose [sic] of this paragraph (8), the working group shall be deemed
to be Beneficiaries who are described in Article II A and C(3) and their
eligible dependents. The non-working group
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-030
Page 5
shall be deemed to be Beneficiaries who are described in Article II B,
C(1), C(2) and E and their eligible dependents.
____________________
*
“Actively at work” includes an Employee of the Employer who was actively at work on
September 30, 1984, and who returns to active work with the Employer within two weeks after
the effective date of the Wage Agreement.
Article III A. (8) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Co-payments for Health Benefits are established as follows:
Benefit Co-Payment
(a) Physician services as an out- Working Group $7.50
patient as set forth in Section A(2) per visit up to a
and physician visits in connection maximum of $150 per 12-
with the benefits set forth in month period*
per family
Section A(3), paragraph (c) but only Non-Working Group —
for pre- and post-natal visit if the $5 per visit up to a maxiphysician charges separately for such mum of $100 per 12-month
visits in addition to the charge for period*
per family.
delivery, and paragraphs (g) through
(m), paragraph (n) except inpatient
surgery, paragraph (o) and Section A(7)
paragraph (F).
(b) Prescription Drugs and insulin as $5 per prescription or
set forth in Section A(4) and take-home refill up to a $50 maxidrugs following a hospital confinement mum per 12-month period*
as set forth in Section A(1)(a). per family. For purposes of this co-payment proIf an employee is covered under an vision, a prescription or
employee Plan (established pursuant refill shall be deemed to
to the NBCWA of 1978) by more than one be each 30 days (or fraction
signatory employer during a 12-month thereof) supply.
period*
, the total co-payments made
by the employee during such period shall
be counted toward the 12-month maximum.
___________________________
*
The 12-month periods shall begin on the following dates: March 27, 1984; March 27, 1985;
March 27, 1986 and March 27, 1987.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-030
Page 6
Discussion
Under Article XX (10) of the 1984 Coal Wage Agreement, health care benefits are guaranteed
during the term of the Agreement, subject to terms of the Agreement at the level of benefits
provided in the 1950 Benefit Plan, 1974 Benefit Plan and the Employer Benefit Plan.
Article XX (10) (g) of the Agreement and Article III A (8) of the Employer Benefit Plan, specify
that the beneficiary will be subject only to a co-payment of $5.00 or $7.50 per office visit, house
call, in-hospital medical admission and clinic or out-patient-department visit.
The claims payment procedures and the obligations of Plan Participants are
further defined under Article XX (10) of the Wage Agreement. In addition to stipulating the copayment per visit and the annual co-payment maximum, this provision describes the usual
procedure for filing claims as one in which the Participant is expected to authorize direct
payment for the provider care and pay the co-payment charge until the maximum is reached. The
language cited by the Respondent in the Explanatory Note to Article XX (10), providing for
circumstances when the Employee pays for the services or drugs, clearly is provided as an
alternative method for recovery of payments made under circumstances in which payment in the
usual manner is not feasible.
Levels of benefits to be provided to Employees, Pensioners and their dependents and survivors
which are established through collective bargaining may not be unilaterally changed. The
Trustees conclude that the Respondent’s use of an 80/20 health coverage plan is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Wage Agreement and the Employer Benefit Plan.
Opinion of the Trustees
The Respondent’s use of an 80/20 health coverage plan is inconsistent with the express
provisions of the 1984 Coal Wage Agreement.
