OPINION OF TRUSTEES
Complainants: Pensioners and Employees
ROD Case No: 81-608 – May 28, 1986
Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William B. Jordan, Trustee; William Miller, Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning health benefits coverage for a pensioner under the terms of the Employer Benefit Plan.
The Complainant is a Pensioner whose last classified signatory work in the coal industry was for Respondent. His pension effective date is November 1, 1983. Respondent was signatory to the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement (“Wage Agreement”) of 1981, which expired on September 30, 1984. According to the evidence submitted, the Complainant’s health benefits coverage was terminated, as of March 31, 1984. The Respondent did not sign the 1984 Wage Agreement.
In an independent investigation conducted by the Funds, it was determined that the Respondent was not “no longer in business” within the meaning of the UMWA 1974 Benefit Plan and Trust, as it was financially able to provide benefits.
The Respondent asserts it is not responsible to provide health benefits coverage to the Complainant, claiming it had a contractual agreement with Island Creek Coal Company which assigns the obligation for health benefits coverage to Island Creek.
The union representative of the Complainant states that the Complainant was last employed by the Respondent but that the Respondent refused to provide benefits coverage to the Complainant.
Whether the Respondent is responsible for providing health benefits to the Complainant as a 1974 Plan pensioner.
Positions of the Parties
Position of Complainant: The Respondent is responsible for the provision of health benefits to the Complainant.
Position of Respondent: Respondent is not responsible for the provision of health benefits to the Complainant as it was a contractor for Island Creek Coal.
Article XX(c)(3)(i) of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1981 provides:
(3)(i) Each signatory Employer shall establish and maintain an Employee benefit plan to provide, implemented through an insurance carrier(s), health and other non-pension benefits for its Employees covered by this Agreement as well as pensioners, under the 1974 Pension Plan and Trust, whose last signatory classified employment was with such Employer. The benefits provided by the Employer to its eligible participants pursuant to such plans shall be guaranteed during the term of this Agreement by that Employer at levels set forth in such plans. Such plans shall also include that each signatory Employer continue to make the death benefit payments in pay status as of December 5, 1977, for deceased Employees and pensioners under the 1974 Pension Plan whose last signatory classified employment was with such Employer, in the same manner and in the same amounts as previously provided for in the 1974 Benefit Plan and Trust. The plans established pursuant to this subsection are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement, and the terms and conditions under which the health and other non-pension benefits will be provided under such plans are as to be set forth in such plans.
Article I(1),(2) and (5) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
ARTICLE I. Definitions
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
(1) “Employer” means (Employer’s Name)
(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1981, as amended from time to time and any successor agreement.
(5) “Pensioner” shall mean any person who is receiving a pension, other than (i) a deferred vested pension based on less than 20 years of credited service, or (ii) a pension based in whole or in part on years of service credited under the terms of Article II & of the 1974 Pension Plan, or any corresponding paragraph of any successor thereto, under the 1974 Pension Plan (or any successor thereto), whose last classified signatory employment was with the Employer, subject to the provisions of Article II B of this Plan.
Article II. B. (1) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Health benefits and life insurance under Article III hereof shall be provided to Pensioners as follows:
(1) Any Pensioner who is not again employed in classified signatory employment subsequent to
(a) such Pensioner’s initial date of retirement under the 1974 Pension Plan, and
(b) June 7, 1981, shall be eligible for coverage as a Pensioner under, and subject to all other provisions of this Plan. Notwithstanding (i) and (ii) of the definition of Pensioner in Article 1(5) of this Plan, any such Pensioner who was eligible for benefits under the 1974 Benefit Plan as a Pensioner on December 5, 1977, shall be eligible for such benefits, subject to all other provisions of this Plan.
Article XX(c)(3)(i) of the 1981 Wage Agreement requires a signatory employer to establish and maintain an employer benefit plan to provide health and other non-pension benefits for its pensioners whose last classified employment was with such employer. Inasmuch as the Complainant’s last signatory classified employment was with the Respondent, the Respondent was responsible for his health benefits coverage during the term of the 1981 Wage Agreement.
The issue here, however, is whether the Respondent was contractually obligated to provide such coverage beyond the expiration of the 1981 Wage Agreement when the Respondent did not sign the 1984 Wage Agreement. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Dist.
29, United Mine Workers of America, et al. v. Royal Coal Co., 768 F.2d 588, 592 (4th Cir. 1985) and Dist. 17, United Mine Workers of America, et al. v. Allied Corp., etc., 765 F.2d 412, 417 (4th Cir. 1985) (en banc), has ruled that an Employer’s contractual obligation to provide health benefits to its pensioners does not extend beyond the expiration of the wage Agreement.
Complainant has also requested in the alternative that coverage be provided under the 1974 Benefit Plan and Trust. Under that Plan, a beneficiary is entitled to coverage only if it is determined that the beneficiary’s last Employer is “no longer in business”. Such determination is made by the Trustees under established procedures separate from the ROD procedure.
Opinion of the Trustees
Given the controlling language of the applicable Wage Agreement and Plan documents and in light of the Fourth Circuit’s recent decisions, the Respondent is not responsible for providing health benefits to the Complainant following the expiration of the 1981 Wage Agreement. However, the Respondent is responsible for providing the Complainant’s health benefits from November 1, 1983 through the expiration of the 1981 Wage Agreement on September 30, 1984.