_____________________________________________________________________________

OPINION OF TRUSTEES
_____________________________________________________________________________

In Re

Complainant: Pensioner
Respondent: Employer
ROD Case No: 81-218 – August 25, 1986

Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William B. Jordan, Trustee; William Miller, Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee.

Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the provision of health benefits coverage for a Pensioner under the terms of the Employer Benefit Plan.

Background Facts

The Complainant is a Pensioner whose last classified signatory employment was with the Respondent on February 5, 1979. The Complainant submitted an application for a pension under the 1974 Pension Plan and Trust on October 12, 1979, and on October 10, 1980 he was awarded an Age 55 retirement pension, effective October 1, 1979, based on 20 years of credited service. The Respondent was signatory to the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement (“Wage Agreement”) of 1978, which expired March 27, 1981, and did not sign the 1981 Wage Agreement. The Respondent terminated the Complainant’s health benefits coverage on March 27, 1981, when it was struck by the union.

The Complainant contends that the Respondent, or in the alternative, the UMWA 1974 Benefit Plan and Trust, is responsible for his health benefits coverage as a Pensioner.

The Respondent has not responded to repeated inquiries by Funds’ staff, and has not provided its position in this dispute.

Dispute

Whether the Respondent is responsible for providing health benefits to the Complainant following the expiration of the 1978 Wage Agreement.

Position of the Parties

Position of the Complainant: The Respondent or the 1974 Benefit Plan and Trust is responsible for the provision of health benefits to the Complainant as a Pensioner.

Position of the Respondent: The Respondent has not provided its position in this dispute.
Pertinent Provisions

Article XX (c)(3)(i) of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1978 provides:

(3)(i) Except as provided in (ii) below, effective on June 1, 1978, each signatory Employer shall establish an Employee benefit plan to provide, implemented through an insurance carrier(s), health and other non-pension benefits for its Employees covered by this Agreement as well as pensioners, under the 1974 Pension Plan and Trust, whose last classified employment was with such Employer. The benefits provided pursuant to such plans shall be guaranteed during the term of this Agreement by each Employer at levels set forth in such plans. Such plans shall also include that each signatory Employer continue to make the death benefit payments in pay status as of December 5, 1977, for deceased Employees and pensioners under the 1974 Pension Plan whose last classified employment was with such Employer, in the same manner and in the same amounts as previously provided for in the 1974 Benefit Plan and Trust. The plans established pursuant to this subsection will be incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement, and the terms and conditions under which the health and other non-pension benefits will be provided under such plans are as to be set forth in such plans.

Article I (1), (2), and (5) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide: Article
Article I – Definitions

The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:

(1) “Employer” means (Employer’s Name).

(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1978. as amended from time to time and any successor agreement.

(5) “Pensioner” shall mean any person who is receiving a pension, other than a deferred vested pension based on less than 20 years of credited service, under the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan (or any successor thereto) whose last classified employment was with the Employer.

Article II B. (i) and (ii) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:

Pensioners
Health benefits and life insurance under Article III hereof shall also be provided to any Pensioner who is receiving pension benefits under the 1974 Pension Plan, or any successor thereto, provided that (i) the Pensioner is not receiving a pension based in whole or in part on years of service credited under the terms of Article II G of the 1974 Pension Plan, or any corresponding paragraph of any successor thereto, or (ii) that the Pensioner is not receiving a Deferred Vested Pension based on less than 20 years of credited service.

Discussion

Article XX(c)(3)(i) of the 1978 Wage Agreement requires a signatory employer to establish and maintain an employer benefit plan to provide health and other non-pension benefits for its pensioners whose last classified employment was with such employer. Inasmuch as the Complainant’s last signatory classified employment was with the Respondent, the Respondent was responsible for his health benefits coverage during the term of the 1978 Wage Agreement.

The issue here, however, is whether the Respondent was contractually obligated to provide such coverage beyond the expiration of the 1978 Wage Agreement when the Respondent did not sign the 1981 Wage Agreement. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Dist. 29, United Mine Workers of America, et. al. v. Royal Coal Co., 768 F. 2d 588, 592 (4th Cir. 1985) and Dist. 17, United Mine Workers of America, et. al. v. Allied Corp., etc., 765 F. 2d 412, 417 (4th Cir. 1985) (en banc), has ruled that an Employer’s contractual obligation to provide health benefits to its employees and pensioners does not extend beyond the expiration of the Wage Agreement.

The Complainant has also requested in the alternative that coverage be provided under the 1974 Benefit Plan and Trust. Under that Plan, an individual is entitled to coverage only if it is determined that the individual’s last Employer is “no longer in business.” Such determination is made by the Trustees under established procedures separate from the ROD procedure.

Opinion of the Trustees

Under the controlling language of the applicable Wage Agreement and Plan documents and in light of the Fourth Circuit’s recent decisions, the Respondent is not responsible for providing health benefits to the Complainant following the expiration of the 1978 Wage Agreement.